首页 | 主题 | 图库 | 问答 | 文摘 | 原创 | 百科

历史 | 地理 | 人物 | 艺术 | 体育 | 科学 | 音乐 | 电影 | 信息技术 | 世界遗产

 开放、中立,源自维基百科

个人工具


阿波罗13号

维库,知识与思想的自由文库

跳转到: 导航, 搜索

Image:03wiki-zn-frontpage-icon.gif阿波罗13号正在翻译。欢迎您积极翻译与修订

本条目描述真实的登月计划。关于同名电影,请参看阿波罗13号 (电影)
阿波罗13号
任务徽章
Apollo 13 insignia
任务数据
任务名称: 阿波罗13号
呼号: 指令/服务舱:奥德赛
登月舱:水瓶座
成员: 3人
发射: 1970年4月11日
19:13:00 UTC
Kennedy Space Center
LC 39A
Lunar flyby:
(Pericynthion)
April 15, 1970
00:21:00 UTC
254.3 km from Moon
400,171 km from Earth
返回: 1970年4月17日
18:07:41 UTC
21° 38' 24" S - 165° 21' 42" W
Duration: 5 d 22 h 54 min 41 s
质量: CSM 28,945 kg;
LM 15,235 kg
Crew picture
Apollo 13 crew portrait (L-R: Lovell, Swigert, and Haise)
Apollo 13 crew portrait
(L-R: Lovell, Swigert, and Haise)
Apollo 13 Crew

阿波罗13号是由美国国家航空航天局(NASA)发射的第三艘载人登月宇宙飞船,在阿波罗载人登月计划中是第7次执行载人任务。阿波罗13号发射于1970年4月11日。阿波罗13号在计划中是第3次登的任务,但是由于飞船在抵达月球前发生的严重故障,无法执行登月计划,3名宇航员最终成功返回地球。

目录

[编辑] 任务成员

(曾执行双子星7号12号阿波罗8号以及阿波罗13号任务),指令长
(曾执行阿波罗13号任务),指令/服务舱驾驶员
(曾执行阿波罗13号任务),登月舱驾驶员
  • 肯·马丁利是原计划中的指令/服务舱驾驶员,但是他由于接触了风疹,在发射前3天被杰克·斯威格特替换。他后来成为执行了阿波罗16号任务并担任指令/服务舱驾驶员。

[编辑] 替补成员

指令长
指令/服务舱驾驶员
登月舱驾驶员

[编辑] 支持团队成员

(曾执行Apollo-Soyuz, STS-5, STS-41-B, and STS-51)
(曾执行Skylab 3 and STS-3)
(曾执行Skylab 4)
(曾执行Skylab 2)

[编辑] 任务数据

[编辑] 氧气罐爆炸

[编辑] 距月球最近点

  • 4月15日, 1970年, 00:21:00 UTC
    • 距月球约254.3公里;
    • 距地球400,171公里(此距离可能是一个记录,请参阅下文)。

[编辑] 请参看

[编辑] 名言

阿波罗 13 號在發生狀況的時候曾經對地上的休斯頓指揮站回報了一句非常有名的話,說「休斯頓,我們出問題了(Houston, we have a problem)」。這句話後來不斷地被各種星際任務相關的電視節目與電影拿來諷刺跟惡搞,變成了整個任務裡面最有名的一句話。

不過,上述的這句通常被引用的句子其實不太正確。當時講出來的真正句子應該是:「好,休斯頓,我們這邊已經出問題了(Okay, Houston, we've had a problem here)」,出自斯威格特之口。稍後洛威尔則回報了一句類似的話:「休斯頓,我們已經出問題了(Houston, we've had a problem)」。

[编辑] Mission highlights

The Apollo 13 mission began with a lesser known malfunction which could have been equally catastrophic. During second stage burn the center engine shut down prematurely. Engineers later discovered that this was due to dangerous pogo oscillations which might have torn the second stage apart; the engine was experiencing 68g vibrations at 16 hertz, flexing the thrust frame by 3 inches. Luckily the oscillations caused a low pressure reading to register, and the computer shut the engine down automatically. This was later traced to amplification of the pogo that had occurred on previous flights by an unexpected interaction with the cavitation in the turbopumps. Later missions had anti-pogo devices as had already been planned since before Apollo 13 which solved the problem.

When Apollo 13 was 321,860 kilometers (199,990 mi) from Earth, an oxygen tank in the service module exploded. The only solution was for the crew to cancel their planned landing, swing around the Moon and return on a trajectory back to Earth. However, because their command/service module "Odyssey" was severely damaged, the three astronauts had to use the lunar module "Aquarius" as a crowded lifeboat for the return home. The four-day return trip was cold, uncomfortable, and tense. But Apollo 13 proved the program's ability to weather a major crisis and bring the crew back home safely.

[编辑] Problem

As the spacecraft was on its way to the Moon, the number two oxygen tank in the Service Module (SM) exploded when Mission Control requested that the crew perform a "cryo stir", in which the oxygen "slush" is stirred to prevent it from stratifying. Teflon insulation covering damaged electrical wires powering the stirrer motor caught fire when power was applied. The fire caused a pressure increase above the tank's nominal 1,000 lbf/in² (7 MPa), and the tank exploded. This explosion damaged other parts of the service module, including the number 1 oxygen tank. At the time of the explosion, however, the true cause was not known; one conjecture was a meteoroid impact. The loss of both oxygen tanks in the service module and thus the oxygen required to create electrical power for the Command/Service Modules (CSM) meant that the CSM had to be completely shut down. The Command Module (CM) contained batteries for use during re-entry, after the Service Module was jettisoned, but these would only last about ten hours, and needed to be saved for re-entry. The crew survived by using the Lunar Module (LM, still attached to the CM) as a "lifeboat".

Apollo 13 damaged Service Module (NASA)
Apollo 13 damaged Service Module (NASA)

The damage to the CSM meant that the Moon-landing mission (originally intended to land at the Fra Mauro Highlands) had to be aborted; a single pass around the Moon was made and the spacecraft returned to Earth. Considerable ingenuity under extreme pressure was required from both the crew and the flight controllers to figure out how to jury rig the craft for the crew's safe return, with much of the world watching the drama on television. One of the major stumbling blocks in this was that the LM "lifeboat" was equipped to sustain two people for two days, and it would now have to sustain three people for four days. One of the most critical problems was that the lithium hydroxide carbon dioxide filters in the LM would not last for all four days, and the CM's spare filters were the wrong shape for the LM's filter receptacle; an adapter had to be fabricated from materials in the spacecraft.

To accomplish a safe return to Earth, a significant course correction to place the spacecraft on a free return trajectory was required. This would normally be a simple procedure using the service module propulsion engine. However, the flight controllers did not know the extent of the damage the service module had suffered and did not want to risk firing the main engine. Instead, the course correction would have to be performed by firing the lunar module's descent engine. After extensive discussion, engineers on the ground found it was possible. The initial maneuver to change to a free return trajectory was made within hours of the accident. The descent engine was fired again after passage around the Moon in order to accelerate the spacecraft's return to Earth, and later for a minor course correction.

As re-entry to Earth's atmosphere approached, NASA took the unusual step of jettisoning the Service Module first, while the Lunar Module was still attached to the Command Module. The LM thrusters were used to maneuver the CM/LM stack to point its windows at the departing SM, and photos were taken. When the crew saw the damaged service module, they reported that the access panel covering the O2 tanks and fuel cells had been blown off.

There was some fear that the extensive condensation in the CM, due to reduced temperatures during the return leg, might have seriously damaged the electronics of the Command Module, which would become apparent upon activation. But the equipment worked perfectly when activated, at least partly due to the extensive design modifications made to the CM after the Apollo 1 fire.

A successful splashdown (NASA)
A successful splashdown (NASA)

The crew returned unharmed to Earth, although Haise had a urinary tract infection resulting from the scarcity of potable water on the damaged ship and the difficulty of disposing of urine, and had to be treated in an infirmary.

While the crew was unfortunate to have this kind of major malfunction, they were still extremely lucky that it occurred on the first leg of the mission when they had a maximum of supplies, equipment, and power to use in the emergency. If the explosion had occurred while in orbit around the moon, or on the return leg after the LM had been jettisoned, the crew probably would not have survived.

After the completion of the mission, there was a full investigation of the incident and the craft was modified to prevent future occurrences of the fault.

Jim Lovell and Jeffrey Kluger's book about the mission, Lost Moon, was later turned into a successful movie, Apollo 13, starring Tom Hanks, Bill Paxton and Kevin Bacon as the Apollo crewmen.

[编辑] Cause of the accident

The explosion on Apollo 13 led to a lengthy investigation of the underlying cause. Thanks to detailed manufacturing records and logs of mission problems, the failure of the faulty oxygen tank was tracked to multiple faults that were not problems individually, but nearly led to disaster on this mission.

Liquid gases are very difficult to handle, and most storage containers holding them are unsealed so that pressure from expanding gas will not cause the container to fail (much like freezing water in even the strongest sealed container will shatter it). Apollo's liquid oxygen tank was a marvel of engineering, able to hold several hundred pounds of highly pressurized liquid gas to supply the craft with oxygen, fuel for electricity (along with hydrogen) and water from the by-product of the fuel cells. Left alone, the tank was capable of safely holding liquid oxygen under high pressure for years before it evaporated because of its design and insulation. Unfortunately, the very characteristic that made the tank useful made internal inspection impossible.

The tank was made of several basic components that were relevant to the accident:

  • A thermostat to control the heater within the tank that sped the evaporation of the liquid into gaseous oxygen;
  • A thermometer to determine the temperature of the heater;
  • Valves and piping that were designed to allow the tank to be completely emptied of liquid by forcing gas into the tank;
  • An interior coating of teflon that protected the wiring from the extremely cold gas; and
  • An internal fan to stir the liquid oxygen (liquid oxygen will turn into a "slush" at these pressures if it is allowed to sit for a long period of time).

These were the basic design, manufacturing and operational problems that led to the accident.

  • The thermostat was originally designed to handle the 28 volt supply that would be used in the command module. However, the specification for the tank was changed so that it had to handle 65 volts on the launch pad. Most of the wiring was changed to handle the higher voltage, but the thermostat was not.
  • The thermometer was designed to read out at the highest operational temperature of the heater, about 100 degrees Fahrenheit. Higher temperatures registered at 100 °F, but the thermostat was supposed to cut out at 80 °F (27 °C), making higher temperatures impossible.
  • During assembly, the structure carrying the tank that failed was dropped about 2 inches (5 cm). The exterior was undamaged, but the pipes that directed flow within the tank became misaligned.
  • For ground testing the tank was filled. However, when it came time to empty it, the problem with the piping was discovered. As such, the tank could not be properly emptied except by running the heater to evaporate the liquid gas. Not using this tank would have delayed the mission and there was no alternative tank available. Lovell was aware of the decision to use the heater to evaporate the oxygen, which was calculated to take a few days at the highest operational temperature of 80 °F (27 °C).
  • However, when the heater was turned on continuously, the higher voltage fused the thermostat, which allowed the heater to keep heating up. Because the thermometer did not register temperatures higher than 100 degrees Fahrenheit (38 degrees Celsius), the monitoring equipment did not pick this up. The current recorder in the power supply showed that the heater was not cycling on and off, but no-one noticed it at the time. Instead of taking several days, the gas evaporated in hours, and the interior of the tank kept heating up, reaching an estimated 800 degrees Fahrenheit (430 °C). This burned off the teflon coating, leaving the wires inside the tank exposed.
  • The rest was inevitable. When the tank was refilled with oxygen, it became a bomb waiting to go off. The order to run the "cryo stir" to run the fans set off sparks inside the tank which led to the explosion.
  • However disaster could have been averted, except that both oxygen tanks were adjacent. Although the second tank survived the explosion, its valves were damaged which allowed the oxygen within to leak out. In future Apollo missions, the two oxygen tanks were separately located.

[编辑] Mission notes

  • There was no time to properly replace the original lunar plaque on Aquarius (which bore Mattingly's name), so Jim Lovell was given a replacement (with Swigert's name) to place over the original plaque once they landed on the moon. However, because the lunar landing was never made, Lovell kept the plaque, which is one of the few mementos from the mission that he has on display at his home.
  • As a result of following the free return trajectory, the altitude of Apollo 13 over the lunar far side was approximately 100 km greater than the corresponding orbital altitude on the remaining Apollo lunar missions. This could mean an all-time altitude record for human spaceflight—not even superseded as of 2006—but this may well not be the case: the variation in distance between Earth and the Moon owing to the eccentricity of the Moon's orbit about Earth is much larger than this 100 km. The Guinness Book of Records did list this flight as having the absolute altitude record for a manned spacecraft, but if this is so, then Lovell should have received a certificate from them attesting to this record (Lovell stated in the book Lost Moon that apart from the plaque and a couple of other pieces of salvage, the only other item he has regarding this mission was a letter from Charles Lindbergh).
  • Superstitious people have often associated the belief that 13 is an unlucky number to the mission, especially due to the fact that the mission began at 13:13 CST, the problems began on April 13, and the mission is called Apollo 13.

[编辑] 徽章

阿波罗13号的徽章上有3匹奔马,题词Ex luna, scientia(来自月球的知识),以及罗马数字的任务数字(13)。和阿波罗11号的徽章一起,两次任务的徽章是阿波罗计划各次任务徽章中仅有的没有任务成员名字的(考虑到发射前3天有任务成员的替换,这算得上是一次幸运的例外)。

[编辑] Relics

The command module is currently displayed at the Kansas Cosmosphere and Space Center, Hutchinson, Kansas. It was formerly at the Musée de l'Air et de l'Espace, Paris. The lunar module burned up in Earth's atmosphere 17 April, 1970, having been targeted to enter over the Pacific Ocean to reduce the possibility of contamination from a radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG) on board (had the mission proceeded as planned, the RTG would have been used to power the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiment Package, and then remained on the Moon). The RTG survived reentry (as designed) and landed in the Tonga Trench. While it will remain radioactive for approximately 2000 years, it does not appear to be releasing radioactive material.

[编辑] Dramatization

[编辑] 外部链接

[编辑] 参考文献



阿波罗计划 阿波罗计划
太空竞赛美国国家航空航天局被取消的阿波罗任务阿波罗宇航员列表
阿波罗1号阿波罗4号阿波罗5号阿波罗6号阿波罗7号阿波罗8号阿波罗9号
阿波罗10号阿波罗11号阿波罗12号阿波罗13号阿波罗14号阿波罗15号阿波罗16号阿波罗17号
其它语言
AD Links